The intelligence layer for construction.
Zerva sits above the systems, specs, reports, and media your teams already produce, then turns scoped project sources into reports, answers, and operational signals with citations.
One source trail, three stakeholder conversations.
P1 tests a narrow promise: the same project record can help GC leadership see what needs attention, help project operators prepare better updates, and help owners receive clearer reviewed language without pushing another app onto the field.
GC leadership
See source-backed signals across active projects: open decisions, RFI timing, source coverage, report status, and the gaps that need a human review.
Project operators
Reduce meeting and report prep by starting from a packet that keeps claims, citations, specs, source health, and current questions together.
Owners and developers
Get clearer project visibility after GC review. Zerva is designed to support transparency without turning unreviewed AI observations into owner-facing claims.
Connect the right sources. Prove the intelligence.
The first wedge is not a vague connect-everything promise. Zerva starts with the project sources that can support trusted reports, project Q&A, and owner-safe language without adding field workflow.
Source-backed briefings
Source-backed report packets turn RFIs, submittals, specs, daily reports, QC records, and selected media into leadership signal with clear source coverage.
Review-gated signals
Zerva separates source facts, calculated metrics, inferred observations, possible risks, reviewed claims, and owner-safe language.
Cross-source intelligence
The RFI in ProjectSight. The spec section in Box. The photo in a QC report. Zerva keeps the source trail attached when those records become project intelligence.
Connections
Scoped source paths, not vague integration promises.
Zerva starts with the sources needed to prove the first contractor pilot. Each source path has a visible status so teams know what is pilot-ready, what is evidence-only, and what is planned.
ProjectSight
First structured project-system path for RFIs, submittals, and workflow objects.
Custom workflow bridge
Daily reports, QC, inspections, and media references can be mapped in a scoped pilot.
Box, specs, and PDFs
Project folders, specifications, generated reports, and selected files can become citable evidence.
Photos and site media
Selected daily, QC, and project media can support visual evidence before heavy vision work.
Procore and Autodesk ACC
Important construction-system paths and ontology inputs, not current production claims.
Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive
Storage and evidence sources planned after the first pilot source paths are proven.
Intelligence delivered where your team already works.
Superintendents should not need another daily app. The pilot reads from the project record that already exists, then gives leadership and PMs a source-backed place to review reports, signals, and project questions.
Portfolio dashboard
Scan active and historical projects with source health, report status, current signals, and the gaps that limit confidence.
Operational metrics
Track source-backed workflow patterns such as RFI timing, open decisions, submittal age, spec pressure, and source freshness.
Report packets
Internal leadership packets and PM meeting-prep packets keep claims, citations, review state, and source coverage together.
Owner-safe drafts
Internal findings can be translated into careful owner-safe language after review, not published as unreviewed AI output.
Scoped source connections
ProjectSight, custom workflow data, Box folders, specs, PDFs, and media are scoped by project and source purpose before processing expands.
Seats included
Pilot pricing is shaped around active projects, selected source families, report scope, and media/camera needs, not per-seat friction.
The data already exists. The understanding doesn't.
Construction went digital but never built the intelligence layer. Submittals, RFIs, daily logs, change orders - it all became PDFs and files scattered across disconnected systems. Zerva is the layer that was always missing.
Systems where the project record already lives: PM tools, specs, reports, folders, photos, schedules, and PDFs.
Source trail leadership still has to synthesize manually when project questions, owner updates, or risks come up.
When an owner asks what you are doing for AI, have an answer.
Owners are going to ask what your AI posture is. Zerva gives GCs a grounded answer: scoped project sources, source-backed facts, report packets, and reviewed owner-safe communication.